Why do people get worked up about suggestions and requests to play something a certain way? Every band I’ve been in that was worth a crap has done that, and every band that didn’t or got angry about being told what to play pretty well sucked.
That said, some people can be dicky about it. Took me a hot minute to figure that out and try not to be dicky. But some people hear the overall picture better than others, and sometimes someone is just plain in charge and wants it that way.
Ken, I don’t want to speak on your situation because you may very well be right on with your thoughts, or you may not. But I would say two years without being asked to change what you do may be a record, and it’s way more than I’ve ever had, even when I was the BL.
I have been in bands playing covers as well as bands with mostly originals (if not originals our
very different from the original version of some songs).
The only time we kept changing things was during the construction of the songs.
After the songs were completed, they remained pretty much unchanged, we even kept the rehearsal set pretty much the same to aid in memorizing the amount of material.
Very seldom a change was suggested (
suggested not
demanded) and when everyone agreed, it was then implemented.
Usually this change would be on a part that we completed before but were not 100% happy with.
Either the guitar player or I would come up with an improved version and we brought it to the next rehearsal.
Sometimes my suggestions got rejected but I never got upset. Sometimes the other guy's suggestions got rejected. It was a complete democracy even though we did have a band leader.
Also, what may sound better
to me, (a more solid fill or a different pattern for certain part), might throw off the guitar or bass player, or maybe, the singer used certain parts to juggle his lyrics around, and now those parts being absent throw him off.
Who knows any number of things can be the reason for a part change
or for a part to remain unchanged....